Current approaches to curricular change often move slowly or are siloed to efforts in individual courses. Curricular prototyping instead involves multiple cycles of low-stakes interventions to ask and answer questions about change drivers and barriers, student and faculty needs, and instructional approaches.
These prototypes don't need to be a reduced-scope or less-polished version of a class activity. Consistent with the engineering design process, many different activities can be used to ask and answer questions to address curricular design goals and challenges. This page is a library of such activities, built in collaboration with our Faculty Community of Practice groups.
Where could changes fit during a semester? What else would need change?
Where could changes fit during a class session? What else would need change?
Identify goals and barriers to changing courses and curriculum
Create space for faculty discussion and practice
Formative peer observation for faculty teaching new topics
Early formative assessment and feedback on a class activity
Seeking student feedback outside of a course setting
How would Systems Thinking modules fit into a course schedule alongside existing course material?
Instructor revises an existing course calendar or develops a new one that includes their desired Systems Thinking activity
Coming soon!
How would a Systems Thinking module fit into a particular day's class activities?
Instructor revises an existing daily lesson plan or develops a new one that includes their desired Systems Thinking activity
Coming soon!
What are students' initial impressions of their learning after a Systems Thinking module?
What is confusing to students after the activity?
Students complete an exit ticket in the last 5 minutes of class to reflect on the class and/or respond to instructor prompts. Exit tickets can be distributed as handouts or in LMS software.
Rate your understanding of today's material (3: Could explain to a classmate; 2: Could partially explain to a classmate; 1: Unsure if could explain to a classmate; 0: Feeling lost)
3-5 sentence free write on a prompt:
How did today's Systems Thinking activity connect with the rest of the course for you?
What is one thing you want to tell me about how today's class went?
Coming soon!
Where is there agreement and excitement between faculty on motivations for curricular change?
Where is there disagreement that could be discussed?
For a department-level change initiative, faculty complete a survey asking about:
Their enthusiasm for different change drivers (e.g. ""Collaboration with Colleagues"" and ""Meeting a Workforce Need"")
Their concerns (e.g. ""Faculty workload"" and ""Teaching outside areas of training"")
Their comfort teaching about Social, Environmental, and Ethical impacts and/or Systems Thinking
How high-priority of a change incorporating Social, Environmental, and Ethical impacts is for them
Motivation: In the context of engineering curricular changes focused on social, environmental, and ethical impacts, how exciting do you find each of the following factors? (5-point Likert Scale: Not At All Excited to Very Excited)
Collaboration with colleagues within the department
Collaboration with colleagues outside the department
Collaboration with colleagues outside the institution
Collaboration with students
Meeting a societal need
Meeting an engineering workforce need
Having shared language and process for teaching about these topics
Opportunity to be creative
Opportunity to learn new pedagogies
Opportunity to share and export curricular innovations
Alignment with institution mission
Alignment with department mission, vision, and values
Alignment with professional codes and standards (e.g., ABET, professional society codes)
Please share anything else you find exciting that we didn't list above
Concerns: In the context of engineering curricular changes focused on social, environmental, and ethical impacts, how concerning or limiting do you find each of the following factors? (5-point Likert Scale: Not at All Concerning or Limiting to Very Concerning or Limiting)
Faculty workload
Student workload
Fitting changes into an existing course
Determining what would align well with other course material
Your knowledge of how to teach about these topics
Using systems thinking as the approach to teach these topics
Your comfort talking about these topics with students
Your comfort talking about these topics with colleagues
Student reception
Please share any other concerns or limitations that we didn't list above
Within our research team, we used survey responses to facilitate internal discussion in department meetings
Developed Faculty Lunch & Learn session to build faculty familiarity with Systems Thinking concepts
What additional background do faculty need to apply Systems Thinking in their courses?
Lunch and learn content included:
An overview of core Systems Thinking competencies
Practice interpreting a system map
Small group discussion of questions about Systems Thinking
Coming Soon!
What do students find motivating when using the Systems Thinking Framework?
How clear are the prompts and directions in a Systems Thinking module?
Student focus groups can be used at multiple stages while developing a new course activity.
Invite a small group of students (5-10) to share their learning goals, as well as contexts and applications for learning that they find motivating and relevant. Intentionally recruit students who will bring a broad range of prior academic experiences and future professional aspirations.
Invite a small group of students (5-10) to test an example Systems Thinking Framework activity and give their feedback, either through discussion or a feedback survey.
Coming soon!
Low-stakes feedback for faculty teaching new material outside their formal training or usual teaching comfort zone
Faculty member conducts a 5 minute lesson with at least one peer observer using part of their Systems Thinking module or an abbreviated activity
Coming Soon!